![]() The Case for Incentive Pay in Nonprofits
by John A. Haas, Ph.D.
The Anti-Incentives Cultural BiasMany nonprofits are under constant pressure to engage in sustained fund raising and marketing efforts just to deliver on their stated vision and purpose. Already strapped for money, how could they possibly afford to pay incentives?Consider first the prevailing culture among nonprofits. While nonprofits, like any organization, need to be mindful of their bottom line, their primary purpose is not to make money, but to fulfill a socially-oriented mission. Employees and volunteers who dedicate time and effort pursuing the mission certainly are not doing so to maximize their personal income. They passionately believe in the cause, and thats what drives them. If offered incentives, many employees at nonprofits may well respond: I already work as hard as I can. The prospect of more money wont get me to work any harder! Offering incentives may even be construed as an insult. Legal limitations, ethical guidelines, and public disclosure requirements govern compensation practices in nonprofits, especially for those engaged in fund raising. A raging controversy exists over the ethics of paying development officers a percentage of funds raised. The Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP) takes a strong and unequivocal stand against contingent-pay. Their 1992 position paper developed by the ethics committee states: "Members shall work for a salary or fee, not percentage-based compensation or a commission." The AFP cites the main consequences of contingent pay:
How Incentives Can HelpOffering key employees or better yet, all employees an opportunity to earn at least some additional compensation can produce the following benefits:
John Haas, president of Management Strategies Group, helps small- and mid-sized organizations manage major change through new organizational designs and compensation systems. Call him at 617-964-1020 or email jhaas@managementstrategiesgroup.com. |